Thursday, April 15, 2010

Promiscuity Leads to STD

You’ll have to forgive me; I’m an old timer, was there a memo from On High changing the rules? The entertainment industry has been pushing the idea of sex without limits for a long time, thumbing their nose at biblical admonitions regarding sexual relations, also found in The Family: A Proclamation to the World , “God has commanded that the sacred powers of procreation are to be employed only between man and woman, lawfully wedded as husband and wife.”

There’s an article by Elizabeth Cohen, CNN senior medical correspondent explaining the downside of ‘friends with benefits’ , coded language for sex outside that of a lawfully wedded husband and wife. For some reason an old Beatles tune came to mind.


Why don’t we do it in the road
No one will be watching us
Why don’t we do it in the road?


“Experts in sexually transmitted diseases say they’ve become increasingly concerned about the trend toward having what they call “sexual involvement in nonromantic contexts” -- the technical term for hookups or “friends with benefits” -- because they’re especially likely to spread sexually transmitted diseases.”


At one time a conservative notion was to be promoted in pubic schools, the idea that Abstinence was the best way to avoid sexually transmitted diseases and unwanted pregnancies among school age children. That idea was laughed at, too parochial; better to teach children about condoms, abortions and adoption which would all be available without having to notify parents.


“I support the doctrine of separation of church and state as traditionally interpreted to prohibit the establishment of an official national religion. But I am opposed to the doctrine of separation of church and state as currently interpreted to divorce government from any formal recognition of God.” Ezra Taft Benson – The Proper Role of Government

We have seen the results of God having been removed from the public schools. Instead of Christian/Judeo values our children are left to the blowing winds, for lack of a term to describe what passes for moral conduct being taught. It’s part of the agenda of the left to destroy the family unit, the most important binding force which supports America’s foundations. What better way to erode the family than to teach sexual concepts which are contrary to traditional family values?


“It seems more acceptable now to have nonromantic sexual encounters,” said Giordano, who’s studied the sex lives of 1,300 teens and young adults in Lucas County, Ohio. “When there’s no romance, there’s no basis for demanding fidelity from the other person.”

If you’re not paying attention that last line might have passed without comment, as if having a romantic bonding equates with marriage; remember marriage, the legal binding of a husband and wife? Is it any wonder young people might be confused as to right and wrong; basic morality has been removed and replaced with Hollywood’s false twin, ‘friends with benefits’.

Why don’t we do it in the road
No one will be watching us
Why don’t we do it in the road?


“She (Giordano) says it’s not just the number of partners at one time; it’s that people’s behavior seems to be different when they’re having “friendly” sex in contrast to romantic sex.”

Now, take a good look at that last sentence and find some of the problems facing our youth if this is the attitude being taught in our schools of higher learning. In my school days, watching the English teacher break down a sentence wasn’t any fun; nouns, verbs, adverbs, adjectives and structure looked like an Algebra equation on the black board, another subject that gave me fits.


How do you follow, “it’s not just the number of partners at one time”? Are we talking ménage à trios or simply various partners at different times of the day or week? Anyway you read that it comes out as risqué.


Well, here’s how Peggy Giordano, a professor of sociology at Bowling Green State University finished that sentence, “friendly” sex in contrast to romantic sex.” Is that an adjective to the original noun ‘sex’ or an adverb to ‘having’ sex? I did mention how I didn’t do so well in English; never even took sex education so it’s no wonder I’m confused.

Why don’t we do it in the road
No one will be watching us
Why don’t we do it in the road?


Carnal urges outside the bonds of marriage have existed in every generation; but I don’t think there’s been a time when the influence of media has had so great an influence as in our day. The rules have never changed, not from Adam and Eve’s time right up until today, “God has commanded that the sacred powers of procreation are to be employed only between man and woman, lawfully wedded as husband and wife.”

No comments: